The plaintiff brought contradictory pleas, alleging the mutations ended up both fraudulent and bogus. The court held that without the supply of possession, the mutation could not be considered as exceptional proof of ownership. Possession is an important ingredient of a present (Hiba), plus the absence of it raised questions https://title-and-ownership-lawye15785.blogzet.com/easements-and-rights-of-way-wakeel-in-karachi-for-dummies-46073896